Legal Opinion
George Foreman and Charles R. Sadler, and v. George Foreman Associates, Ltd., and George Foreman Associates, Ltd., and v. George Foreman, And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1975No. 74-2143, 74-2216PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before VAN OOSTERHOUT,* WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge:
George Foreman Associates, Ltd., appeals from a judgment holding a 1972 agreement between Associates and George Foreman void as a boxing man*356agement contract which fails to comply with California law in numerous respects. We affirm.
The facts are fully set out in the opinion of the district court which is reported at 389 F.Supp. 1308 (N.D.Cal. 1974). We agree that California law renders the 1972 agreement void and adopt the reasoning of the opinion below. We find no merit in Associates’ argument that our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hudson v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Boatland, Inc. And Robert L. Moore v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- American Re-Insurance Co. v. INSURANCE COM'N, ETC.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.