Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Craft
California Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1949No. S. F. 17807PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal, because "of their failure to amend their complaint, after a demurrer thereto was sustained with leave to amend.
Plaintiff (the reference herein will be to the one plaintiff, the other one being his father who makes a claim for hospital and medical expenses) alleges that he is 18 years of age ¡ ’that defendants were conducting a carnival where one of the concessions, for which a- separate admission fee was charged, consisted of boxing exhibitions; that such concession was conducted in violation of section 412 of the Penal Code, and the Business &…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Reitmeister v. ReitmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Luthringer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.