Legal Opinion
Huffman v. Hendry
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1894No. 1,130PublishedCited by 4 opinions
From the Steuben Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
The appellee, in the court below, filed a claim, in two paragraphs, against said Margaret Huffman as administratrix of the estate of Daniel Huffman, deceased, pursuant to the provisions of section 2465, R. S. 1894 (2310, R. S. 1881).
The substantial averments in the first paragraph are, that at the sale of the personal property of said decedent, the appellee, upon the faith of the representations and warranty of said administratrix, which he believed to be true, that two Durham cows were with calf, from a thoroughbred bull, purchased and paid for them, and that said cows in fact were not with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. CashIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Rodman v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Mills v. KuykendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
- Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cornthwaite v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chaney v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bormann v. SimpsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Bright National Bank v. HansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Beeson v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912