Legal Opinion
Rose v. Cash
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 29 opinions
Prom the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, C. J.
Replevin by appellant, against the appellee, to recover the possession of a promissory note.
The errors assigned do not present any question on the pleadings. We do not, therefore, state them.
Trial by jury; verdict as follows:
“ We, the jury, find for the defendant.”
With this general verdict, they answered certain questions, as follows:
“1. Is the note in suit the property of the plaintiff?
“Answer. Yes.
“2. Rid the defendant know the plaintiff claimed the note, before he took out letters of administration on the estate of Prancis M. Harris, deceased ?
“Answer. Yes.
“3. Rid the defendant have the…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- White v. McFarlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Aultman & Co. v. ForgeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Martz v. PutnamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Teague v. AbbotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.