Legal Opinion

Mills v. Kuykendall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1827PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of assumpsit by Kuykendall, administrator of JVathan Harness, against Mills, and Harness, administrators of Adam Harness. The declaration contains two counts. In the first count, the plamtiff avers- that Michael Harness, one of the heirs of Adam Harness, deceased', being entitled to 100 dollars from the defendants, administrators of the estate, drew an order in writing for 80 dollars in' favour of JVathan Harness, for value received from him, directed to the defendants,administrators, as follows:—“Please, to settle 80 dollars, out of my part of the estate, with JVathan…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fall v. HazelriggIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Harper v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Krohn v. BantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Turner v. Peoria & Springfield RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API