Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether a party who intervenes in a workers’ compensation matter must appear at the hearing at which a compensation judge resolves the intervenor’s claim for reimbursement. In this case, the intervenors are two health-care providers that provided treatment to an employee, but had their claims for reimbursement denied when they failed to attend a hearing before a compensation judge. In a divided decision, the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of their claims. For the reasons set forth below, we also affirm.
I
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Kelly Dennis v. The Salvation Army and Chesterfield Services, Inc., Relators, and HealthEast Physician Services, HealthEast St. John's Hospital, High Pointe Surgery Center, Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, St. Croix Orthopaedics, and Nurse Anesthesia Services, P.A., Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- J & W Asphalt, Inc. v. Belle Plaine Township, State of Minnesota, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017