Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2015No. A14-0726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether a party who intervenes in a workers’ compensation matter must appear at the hearing at which a compensation judge resolves the intervenor’s claim for reimbursement. In this case, the intervenors are two health-care providers that provided treatment to an employee, but had their claims for reimbursement denied when they failed to attend a hearing before a compensation judge. In a divided decision, the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of their claims. For the reasons set forth below, we also affirm.

I

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Kelly Dennis v. The Salvation Army and Chesterfield Services, Inc., Relators, and HealthEast Physician Services, HealthEast St. John's Hospital, High Pointe Surgery Center, Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, St. Croix Orthopaedics, and Nurse Anesthesia Services, P.A., Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Founders Insurance Company v. James YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. J & W Asphalt, Inc. v. Belle Plaine Township, State of Minnesota, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API