Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant James Yates was injured in a car accident in Minnesota and sought basic economic loss benefits under Minnesota’s No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2014), from respondent Founders Insurance Company, his insurer. Founders argued that the Act does not require it to provide basic economic loss coverage because Founders is an out-of-state insurer that does not write motor vehicle insurance in Minnesota. An arbitrator awarded Yates $19,128 in basic economic loss benefits, and the district court confirmed the arbitration award. The court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Sumner v. Jim Lupient InfinitiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017