Legal Opinion

People v. Frye

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 24, 1997No. 97SA30PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have recommended that the respondent either be suspended for three years or be disbarred. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, with the recommendation that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1975. He was immediately suspended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. HilgendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. TerborgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. BollingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HotleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. NearenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. BoyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. In Re LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. SichtaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API