Legal Opinion

People v. Hilgendorf

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 22, 1995No. 95SA131PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, George M. Hilgendorf, Sr., was convicted of two counts of making false statements to federal banks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (1988). The offense is classified as a felony and constitutes a serious crime. C.R.C.P. 241.16(e). The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct containing the recommendation that the respondent be disbarred. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. TerborgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. BollingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. HotleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. NearenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API