Legal Opinion

People v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 4, 1997No. 97SA222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed in the conditional admission to discipline in the form of a suspension from the practice of law in the range of one year and one day to two years. In approving the conditional admission, an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee recommended that the respondent be suspended for two years. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. HilgendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. TerborgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SchmeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. BontragerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Boyle v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. People v. FainSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  5. People v. SugarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API