People v. Sichta
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding was convicted of wire fraud and securities fraud. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred. Neither party has excepted to the panel’s action. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.
I
The respondent was licensed to practice law in this state in 1982. Because the respondent did not answer the formal complaint, a default was entered against him. The respondent therefore admitted the facts and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. HilgendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Marc R. EngelmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SichtaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SugarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015