Legal Opinion

People v. Sichta

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 2, 1997No. 97SA323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding was convicted of wire fraud and securities fraud. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be disbarred. Neither party has excepted to the panel’s action. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was licensed to practice law in this state in 1982. Because the respondent did not answer the formal complaint, a default was entered against him. The respondent therefore admitted the facts and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. HilgendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Marc R. EngelmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. SichtaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. SugarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API