Legal Opinion

People v. Nearen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1998No. 97SA449PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The complainant and the respondent in this lawyer discipline case executed a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be disbarred because of his federal felony convictions. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission. We accept the conditional admission and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1978. The conditional admission provides that the respondent was named as a defendant in an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HilgendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HotleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. People v. DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. LarsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. People v. NitschkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API