Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Medina v. Hillshore Partners

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1995No. B089355PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Norma Laura Medina, individually and as guardian ad litem for her son Carlos Antonio Medina, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer of respondents Hillshore Partners doing business as Hillshore Garden Apartments, James Boyd, and Interstate Equities Corporation (hereafter landowner).

*480Appellants contend that landowner was liable for the death of Juan Carlos Medina because gang members were allowed to congregate in and around a Santa Barbara apartment complex owned by landowner. The gang assaulted the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Castaneda v. OlsherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. McGettigan v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Daly v. Denny's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Hassoon v. ShamiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API