Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Olsher

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2007No. S138104PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Defendants George Olsher, Paule Olsher and P&G Enterprises (collectively Olsher) own a mobilehome park in which plaintiff Ernest Castaneda lived. Plaintiff was shot and injured while he was a bystander to a gang confrontation involving a resident of the mobilehome across the street from his. He sued Olsher contending Olsher had breached a duty not to rent to known gang members or to evict them when they harass other tenants. The superior court granted a defense motion for nonsuit after presentation of plaintiff’s case, but the Court of Appeal reversed.

*1210We conclude the grant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Verdugo v. Target Corp.California Supreme Court · 2014

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API