Lauder v. Currier
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Stephens & Stephens, George H. Moore, Herbert Cutler Brown, and Frederick B. Braden, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The suit was brought to recover damages for injuries to the plaintiff caused by the fall of the defendant’s elevator. The plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendant appeals.
The points urged by the appellant are: (1) That the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict as to damages; (2) and, also, in that the proof showed that the injury was the result of inevitable accident, and not of defendant’s negligence. Appellant complains also of certain errors in the rulings of the court relating to the two points above specified, which may be conveniently considered in connection with…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Kuhns v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.