Legal Opinion

Handley v. Lombardi

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1932No. Docket No. 7881PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff following a jury verdict. Plaintiff and respondent was injured in a collision between an automobile truck in which he was riding and an automobile driven by appellant. There is evidence from 'which the jury might find that the truck in which respondent was riding was being operated on the extreme northerly or right-hand side of Twenty-third Street in San Francisco approaching its intersection with Folsom Street from the east; that upon arriving at the easterly property line of Folsom Street the truck was brought to a stop;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Squires v. RiffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Dalley v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API