Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Enneddam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 21, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a driver for a limousine company for nearly three years. On May 23, 2004, he reported to work at his regular time of between 4:30 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. and waited several hours for a driving assignment. The dispatcher told him that if he was unhappy with the situation, he could go home. Claimant left his job and subsequently…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GiovatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of FierroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of SangiorgioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of ScirriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of BehuniakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006