Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Gray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Harper District Court. Action to recover on a promissory note. Trial at the January term, 1888, and judgment for plaintiff Gray. The defendant Kirkpatrick brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was an action to recover on a promissory note executed May 11, 1886, by J. St. Clair Gray, W. R. Kirkpatrick, and C. P. Aspinwall, for the sum of $200, payable to the First National Bank of Anthony, Kansas, sixty days after date, with interest at 12 per cent, per annum after maturity. Clara Gray, the wife of J. St. Clair Gray, brought this action against W. R. Kirkpatrick alone, alleging that she purchased the note from the bank on July 20, 1886, and that she was the owner and legal holder of the same. In his answer, Kirkpatrick…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swerdsfeger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Silvers v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Whittenhall v. KorberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Francis v. First Nat. Bank of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Johnson v. CullinanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Redfield State Bank v. MyrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API