Legal Opinion

Whittenhall v. Korber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Nemaha District Cowrt. Action on a promissory note, brought by Korber, as plaintiff, who had judgment at the April Term 1873. The facts and proceedings on which the questions decided are based, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action on á promissory note. Henry Korber was the payee thereof, and C. T. "Whittenhall, A. Kyger, ~W. G. Sargent, and “Dickinson & Cowdry,” were the makers thereof. The payee of the note sued all the makers in one action, but afterward on the suggestion of the death of Oliver C. Dickinson, one of the makers, and one of the firm of “Dickinson & Cowdry” the plaintiff dismissed his action as against “ Dickinson & Cowdry,” and proceeded with the action against the other three defendants only. There was no error and no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Alvey v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Hutchison v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Kirkpatrick v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Topeka State Bank v. WatersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Misco Leasing, Inc. v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API