Swerdsfeger v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error from Nemaha District Court. At the June Term, 1878, of the district court, The State, as plaintiff, had judgment against Swerdsfeger, as defendant, and as surety in a certain recognizance. The defendant brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This was an action on a criminal recognizance. Judgment was rendered in the district court in favor of the state, and the defendant brings the case here for review. His counsel has filed a brief, in which many points are presented and discussed at length. Unfortunately for him, most of the points made have been already decided by this court adversely to his claims, and we see no reason to de-part from those rulings. He filed a motion to set the summons aside, on the ground that the return-day was less than ten days from its date. Such a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Barkley v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Jenks v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tillson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Ervin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Horton v. HainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Continental Ins. Co. v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kirkpatrick v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.