Legal Opinion
Davis v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 22, 2005No. A120534PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, P. J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) in which the board deferred petitioner’s parole consideration for 24 months. He asserts that the board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence and that the board applied the wrong standard of proof in evaluating the record. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Petitioner was convicted in 1992 of first-degree rape and first-degree burglary. On the rape charge, petitioner was sentenced as a dangerous offender to an indeterminate sentence not to exceed 30 years, with an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Davis v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Baize v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.