Smith v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Pursuant to ORS 183.400, 1 petitioner, an inmate of a Department of Corrections (DOC) facility, challenges a number of rules in OAR chapter 219, division 131, that govern incoming and outgoing inmate mail. 2 He asserts that several rules violate Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution and the federal Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution because they deprive inmates of a “meaningful opportunity to contest rejections, confiscations and censorship of incoming mail”; that certain rules that prohibit inmates from sending and receiving particular materials violate the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Washington v. WerholtzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Byers v. Dept. of Corrections (A174503)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.