Legal Opinion

Smith v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 2008No. A114180PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Pursuant to ORS 183.400, 1 petitioner, an inmate of a Department of Corrections (DOC) facility, challenges a number of rules in OAR chapter 219, division 131, that govern incoming and outgoing inmate mail. 2 He asserts that several rules violate Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution and the federal Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution because they deprive inmates of a “meaningful opportunity to contest rejections, confiscations and censorship of incoming mail”; that certain rules that prohibit inmates from sending and receiving particular materials violate the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Laseur v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Washington v. WerholtzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Byers v. Dept. of Corrections (A174503)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API