Legal Opinion

Davis v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2006No. CA A120534; SC S52803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

ORS 144.228(l)(b) provides that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) shall give a prisoner who has been sentenced as a dangerous offender a release date “if the condition [that] made the prisoner dangerous is absent or in remission.” In this case, the board did not set a release date for petitioner because it found by a preponderance of the evidence that the condition that made him dangerous was not absent or in remission. Petitioner argues that due process requires the board to set a release date unless it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the condition that made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Engweiler v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Davis v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Stogsdill v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Morrison v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Bell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API