Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

An understanding of the precise nature of the cause of action upon which the judgment has been rendered is indispensable to a determination of the validity of the assignments of error.

When it is construed with a proper degree of liberality, the complaint states two causes of action alternative in nature, to wit: (1) A primary cause of action for damages for breach of an implied warranty that the fourteen oil burners were reasonably fit for the particular use of curing tobacco; and (2) a secondary cause of action for breach of an express contract, i.e., the agreement of October 18, 1946, by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Thomason v. Ballard & Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. RadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Cathey v. ShopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Southern Box and Lumber Co. v. Home Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Woods v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API