Stokes v. Edwards
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
An understanding of the precise nature of the cause of action upon which the judgment has been rendered is indispensable to a determination of the validity of the assignments of error.
When it is construed with a proper degree of liberality, the complaint states two causes of action alternative in nature, to wit: (1) A primary cause of action for damages for breach of an implied warranty that the fourteen oil burners were reasonably fit for the particular use of curing tobacco; and (2) a secondary cause of action for breach of an express contract, i.e., the agreement of October 18, 1946, by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Thomason v. Ballard & Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. RadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Cathey v. ShopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Southern Box and Lumber Co. v. Home Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Woods v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.