Legal Opinion

Cathey v. Shope

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1953No. 113PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Tbe court below gave a peremptory instruction in favor of tbe plaintiff. Exception thereto poses this question for decision: Does all tbe competent testimony in this cause, considered in tbe light most favorable to defendants, tend to show that defendants are indebted to plaintiff in tbe sum of $3,675 ? Tbe court below, by its instruction, answered in tbe affirmative. We agree.

Tbe defendants listed their property for sale witb plaintiff. He advertised tbe same and contacted prospective purchasers. Defendants from time to time went to bis office to inquire as to tbe prospects of sale. Finally,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. May v. Getty.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. H. M. Wade Manufacturing Co. v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Griffin v. United Services Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Patton v. Sinclaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Bell v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Gunter v. WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API