Southern Box and Lumber Co. v. Home Chair Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Defendant assigns as error findings of fact Numbers 4, 5, 7 and 8. Defendant contends, 'among other contentions, that an examination of findings of fact Numbers 3, 5 and 8 shows “that these findings of fact are predicated on issues which do not arise on the pleadings rand with respect to which the defendant had no opportunity to make preparation.”
When the parties in the instant ease waived a juiy trial, pursuant to G.S. 1-184—1-185, the effect of it was to invest the judge with the dual capacity of judge and juror. It is familiar learning that if the plaintiff is to succeed at all, whether-…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Talley v. Harriss Granite Quarries Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Payne v. Valley Motor Sales, IncorporatedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Tarlton v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Wagstaff v. Remco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Super Tire Market, Inc. v. RollinsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.