Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 21, 1988No. Nos. 87-5471, 87-5910PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Virgilio J. Granata appeals (at 87-5471) a district court order denying his motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, which alleges violations of their constitutional rights. In the alternative, he requests relief in the form of a writ of mandamus (at 87-5910) ordering the district court to dismiss the complaint. Because the complaint stated claims arising under the law of the United States, the district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331 (West Supp.1988).1 We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s interlocutory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kulwicki v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Estate Robert Smith v. MarascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Grant v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API