Legal Opinion
Kulwicki v. Dawson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 2, 1992No. Nos. 91-3358, 91-3394PublishedCited by 450 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Dawson, Loutzenhiser and Mullen challenge the district court’s denial *1457of their individual claims of official immunity. Dawson is the District Attorney for Crawford County, Pennsylvania. Loutzen-hiser and Mullen are both employed by the City of Meadville Police Department, Lout-zenhiser as a Detective Sergeant and Mullen as the Chief of Police.
Appellee Kulwicki, a local attorney, brought suit against the three men under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they conspired to deprive him of constitutional rights when they unsuccessfully charged him…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by450 opinions
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Jones v. CannonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.