Legal Opinion
Beidler v. Photostat Corporation
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1935No. 1616PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPEY, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement by defendant of United States letters patent No. 1,757,001, issued to plaintiff May 6, 1930, on improvements in a photographic apparatus designed for making photostatic copies of documents on both sides of a film-coated sheet of paper. There are eleven claims in this patent, and plaintiff charges infringement of all claims except claim No. 3, Defendant concedes that claims 1 and 2 and 4 to 7, inclusive, of the patent in suit are valid, denies that the “Photostat Recorder,” the machine which it has manufactured and sold since the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- L.A. Gear, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Detroit Lubricator Co. v. ToussaintDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1944
- Elevator Appliance Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Freedman v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.