Legal Opinion

Elevator Appliance Co. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 6, 1939No. 180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Elevator Appliance Co., Inc., as exclusive licensee, and Harry R. Cullmer, as owner, brought suit for alleged infringement of two patents, numbered respectively 1,945,734 and 2,060,283. They relate to electro-mechanical locks to be used in the hatch-way of self-service elevators. The suit was originally brought against Brooks and his sister, Mrs. Brozozowski, doing business under the firm name of Eastern Elevator Co., but after the intervention of Harry Leon, the manufacturer of the locks alleged to infringe, the plaintiffs voluntarily discontinued as against the original…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. ErrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Precise Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  4. Duplex Envelope Co. v. Denominational Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Beidler v. Photostat CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Detroit Lubricator Co. v. ToussaintDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1944
  2. Howe v. AtwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
  3. Buxton Incorporated v. Julen IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Lanfare v. WolkDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API