L.A. Gear, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REA, District Judge.
On June 20, 1994, the Court conducted a hearing regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Voit Sports, Inc. (“Voit”). Having duly considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the evidence submitted by all parties, the applicable authorities and the arguments of counsel, the Court finds that, as a matter of law, defendant Voit neither directly nor indirectly infringed the patent-in-suit owned by plaintiff L.A. Gear, Inc. (“LAG”). Accordingly, the Court hereby grants Voit’s motion in its entirety.
I.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Cybiotronics, Ltd. v. Golden Source Electronics, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Rainey v. LangenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.