Legal Opinion

Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment. The complaint alleges two claims: first, patent infringement and, second, unfair competition. Defendant originally moved for summary judgment on the first claim only; thereafter, but before final argument of the motion, it also applied for dismissal of the second claim for lack of pendent jurisdiction. 1

For the disposition of this motion, we take the facts substantially as they are alleged in the compiaint and in plaintiff’s opposing affidavits, with a few exceptions to be specifically noted hereinafter.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maltais v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  2. Kaz Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Magna Pictures Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1967
  4. Saint Anthony-Minneapolis, Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
  5. Allergan, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API