Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment. The complaint alleges two claims: first, patent infringement and, second, unfair competition. Defendant originally moved for summary judgment on the first claim only; thereafter, but before final argument of the motion, it also applied for dismissal of the second claim for lack of pendent jurisdiction. 1
For the disposition of this motion, we take the facts substantially as they are alleged in the compiaint and in plaintiff’s opposing affidavits, with a few exceptions to be specifically noted hereinafter.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maltais v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Kaz Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Magna Pictures Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1967
- Saint Anthony-Minneapolis, Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
- Allergan, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.