Legal Opinion

State v. Droste

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1998No. 97-998PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issues presented by this case are (1) whether liquor control investigators have the authority to stop an individual for violating traffic laws, and (2) if the liquor control investigators did not have the authority to make a traffic stop, must all evidence deriving from that stop be suppressed.

R.C. 5502.61(C) and (D)1 set forth the authority granted by the legislature to liquor control investigators:

“(C)(1) A liquor control investigator, on any retail liquor permit premises or any other premises where a violation of Title XLIII of the Revised Code or any rule adopted under it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Independent Insurance v. FabeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. HolbertOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gabbard v. Madison Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API