Legal Opinion
State v. Holbert
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1974No. 73-489PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
Appellant’s assignments of error in the Court of Appeals were:
“1. The township patrolman in this case was prohibited by O. R. C. Sec. 4513.39 from initiating the two charges in question against the defendant. The court erred in not dismissing the charges at the conclusion of the state’s case.
“2. The court did not have jurisdiction over the person of the defendant since the defendant was never arrested for the two charges and did not submit to the court’s jurisdiction. The court erred in not dismissing the charges at the conclusion of the state’s case.”
In overruling those assignments of error,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ZdovcOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. HooperOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MbodjiOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DarrahOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DrosteOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.