Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hutton v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1972No. 71-337PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

At the outset, it should be noted that no claim is made by or on behalf of the Industrial Commission that it would have any authority to deduct, from the determination of relator’s percentage of permanent partial disability, the percentage determined in making an award to the same person in a separate claim which predated the injury in question. In any event, our decision in State, ex rel. Shewalter, v. Indus. Comm. (1969), 19 Ohio St. 2d 12, would appear to preclude such authority, in the absence of a specific finding that a portion of a workman’s present disability is unrelated to the claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Shewalter v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Eberhardt v. Flxible Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Wallace v. Industrlal CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API