Legal Opinion

Ferens v. John Deere Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1990No. 88-1512PublishedCited by 492 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

Section 1404(a) of Title 28 states: “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U. S. C. § 1404(a) (1982 ed.). In Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U. S. 612 (1964), we held that, following a transfer under § 1404(a) initiated by a defendant, the transferee court must follow the choice-of-law rules that prevailed in the transferor court. We now decide that, when a plaintiff moves for the transfer, the same rule applies.

I

Albert Ferens lost his right hand…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by492 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re Volkswagen Ag Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

487 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API