Legal Opinion
Bhatia v. 3M Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 1, 2018No. Civil No. 16–1304 (DWF/BRT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge *1089INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on a Partial Motion to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") brought by Defendant 3M Company ("3M" or "Defendant") (Doc. No. 87). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion.
BACKGROUND
This case involves a 3M product, the Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM Dental Restorative ("Lava Ultimate"). Lava Ultimate is a product designed for dentists to use in making customized dental restorations, such as veneers, inlays, onlays,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bates v. Monarch Dental ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Boyd v. Target Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Jack & Joe’s Franchising, Inc. d/b/a Squeegee Squad; Jack & Joe’s Management Company v. Eric Bernadin; EB Window Cleaning LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- KAVON v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Knox v. Impact MHC Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.