Legal Opinion
Christian v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 9, 2001No. Civ.A. DKC 98-371, Civ.A. S 97-3107, Civ.A. AW 97-3887, Civ.A. PJM 97-3791PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
These products liability actions brought by Suzanne Christian, Joan Harris, Mary Bywater, and Brenda Strickland (“Plaintiffs”), against Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company (“3M”) 1 have been consolidated for resolution of 3M’s pending motion for summary judgment. The issues have been fully briefed, and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the court shall GRANT Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
These cases involve silicone breast implants. 2 Donald McGhan an engineer, and some of his…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Paccar Inc. v. Elliot Wilson Capitol Trucks LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Sayyed v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Rosen v. Kore Holdings, Inc. (In Re Rood)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.