Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William E. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the' court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying the defendant a new trial.
On July 15, 1893, the Sierra Ice Company was the owner of certain icehouses situated in Hevada county. Upon that day *436three of its houses, which were insured with plaintiff for fifteen thousand dollars, were totally destroyed by fire. The ice company presented its claim of loss for forty-four thousand dollars. The plaintiff paid the full amount of insurance, and after payment, being subrogated to the ice company, made demand upon the Southern Pacific Company for reimbursement, contending that the fire had been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sheldon v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Longabaugh v. Virginia City & Truckee RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Spolter v. Four-Wheel Brake Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.