Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Lawson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Crook: T. E. J. Duffy, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. This is an action for $1,149.46, based upon seven different accounts assigned to plaintiff for collection; one for printing advertisements amounting to $111.35, and the others for balances on account of goods, wares and merchandise. The answer consists of general denials.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The defendant’s attorney filed a motion for a continuance of the cause supported by his own affidavit showing substantially the following facts: Douglas Lawson is a resident of Prineville, Crook County, Oregon. In July, 1916, in response to the call of the President of the United States, the National Guard of the various States of the Union were called into the service of the United States for duty upon the Mexican Border. Although living in Oregon, the defendant was a member of the National Guard of the State of Massachusetts, and responding to the call enlisted with his regiment in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Linn County v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. Harrell / WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Finch v. WALLBERG DREDGING COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gubler v. BoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gubler v. BoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API