Legal Opinion

Hartt v. Munobe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1993No. 91-2025PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This case presents several issues, of which the central is whether a referee may preside over a jury trial. If the answer is yes, we must decide whether, in this case, all parties consented to the presence of the referee in conformity to Civ.R. 53(A).

I

The relevant portions of Civ.R. 53 as in effect at the time of trial1 state:

“(A) Appointment. The court may appoint one or more referees, who shall be attorneys at law admitted to practice in this state, to hear an issue or issues in *5any case in which the parties are not entitled to a trial by jury or in any case in which the parties consent in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Shelly Materials, Inc v. Streetsboro Planning & Zoning Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. City of Dayton v. WhitingOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Tally v. Patrick, 2008-T-0072 (4-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API