Legal Opinion
Hartt v. Munobe
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1993No. 91-2025PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This case presents several issues, of which the central is whether a referee may preside over a jury trial. If the answer is yes, we must decide whether, in this case, all parties consented to the presence of the referee in conformity to Civ.R. 53(A).
I
The relevant portions of Civ.R. 53 as in effect at the time of trial1 state:
“(A) Appointment. The court may appoint one or more referees, who shall be attorneys at law admitted to practice in this state, to hear an issue or issues in *5any case in which the parties are not entitled to a trial by jury or in any case in which the parties consent in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by121 opinions
- Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Shelly Materials, Inc v. Streetsboro Planning & Zoning Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- City of Dayton v. WhitingOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Tally v. Patrick, 2008-T-0072 (4-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.