Legal Opinion

Rolley, Inc. v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1954No. Civ. 16101PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*845DOOLING, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered from an order sustaining a demurrer to a third amended complaint without leave to amend.

The third amended complaint alleges the following; Defendant Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Norman) is a competitor of plaintiff in the cosmetics business; that defendant Norman distributes in excess óf 3 per cent of all perfumery and cosmetic products; defendant retailers are engaged in business of purchasing cosmetics, etc., from manufacturers and distributors thereof for resale to the general public; upon information and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Farr v. BramblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Classen v. WellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API