Legal Opinion

Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1977No. Civ. 15685PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Claiming to be totally disabled and, thus, entitled to benefits under a group disability insurance policy issued by defendant, plaintiff sought declaratory relief and compensatory and punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A jury trial resulted in a special verdict that plaintiff was totally disabled and general verdicts in favor of plaintiff for $172,325 in compensatory damages and $2.5 million in punitive damages. Judgment was entered on the jury verdicts. Defendant’s motion for new trial as to the issue of damages was denied. Defendant appeals…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API