Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Claiming to be totally disabled and, thus, entitled to benefits under a group disability insurance policy issued by defendant, plaintiff sought declaratory relief and compensatory and punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A jury trial resulted in a special verdict that plaintiff was totally disabled and general verdicts in favor of plaintiff for $172,325 in compensatory damages and $2.5 million in punitive damages. Judgment was entered on the jury verdicts. Defendant’s motion for new trial as to the issue of damages was denied. Defendant appeals…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.