Joseph v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Richard B. Joseph appeals the post-conviction court's summary denial of his post-conviction relief petition. Joseph claims the post-conviction court's summary denial was erroneous for three reasons: 1) because the post-conviction court did not allow his public defender adequate time to investigate and possibly amend the petition; 2) because the post-conviction court did not first issue a show cause order pursuant to Ind.Trial Rule 41(E); and 3) because his petition raised disputed factual matters making the denial inappropriate without a hearing. Joseph also…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Settlement TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Schiro v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Montano v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Robertson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Neville v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hamilton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.