Hamilton v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant James Hamilton appeals the dismissal of his second petition for post-conviction relief.
We affirm.
Hamilton's sole issue for our review is whether the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his second petition for post-conviction relief.
In 1988, a jury convicted Hamilton of murder. He appealed, contending the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction in Hamilton v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 218.
In 1985, Hamilton filed his first pro se petition for post-conviction relief.1 The court denied it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- James v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Phillips v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Cornelius v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kirk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994