Wine v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Bobby Dean Wine (Wine) appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.
We affirm the post-conviction court.
ISSUES
Wine presents seven issues for our review which we re-state as follows:
1. Whether fundamental error occurred when Wine was convicted of conspiracy to commit burglary despite alleged defects in the charging information.
2. Whether fundamental error occurred when Wine was convicted of theft despite alleged defects in the charging information.
3. Whether fundamental error occurred due to the prosecutor’s comments…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Burris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tapia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Channell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Elisea v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- LEGGS v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.