Legal Opinion

Schiro v. Indiana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 16, 1989No. 89-5327PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.

Opinion of

Justice Stevens

respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.

There is a critical difference between a judgment of affirmance and an order denying a petition for a writ of certiorari. The former determines the rights of the parties; the latter expresses no opinion on the merits of the case.1 Partly for that reason, and *911partly because our certiorari docket is so crowded, the Court does not explain its reasons for entering such orders. There is, accordingly, a danger that an individual Justice’s statement of his or her views respecting the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Fugate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Thomas Schiro v. Richard Clark, Superintendent, and Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Hobson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API