Schiro v. Indiana
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.
Opinion of
Justice Stevens
respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.
There is a critical difference between a judgment of affirmance and an order denying a petition for a writ of certiorari. The former determines the rights of the parties; the latter expresses no opinion on the merits of the case.1 Partly for that reason, and *911partly because our certiorari docket is so crowded, the Court does not explain its reasons for entering such orders. There is, accordingly, a danger that an individual Justice’s statement of his or her views respecting the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fugate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Thomas Schiro v. Richard Clark, Superintendent, and Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Hobson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.