Legal Opinion
R.E. Dailey & Co. v. John Madden Co., Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 28, 1993No. 93-1058UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 F.3d 1242
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
R.E. DAILEY & COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHN MADDEN COMPANY, LTD.; Detroit Development Group, Ltd.;
John Madden, Jr., jointly and severally; First National
Bank of Boston; Jefferson Street Properties, Inc.,
intervenors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-1058.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 28, 1993.
Before JONES and…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Mangold v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe Of Chippewa Indians v. Jennifer GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007