Legal Opinion

Mangold v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 14, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00214Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DAVID H. MANGOLD, ) CASE NO. 5:20-cv-214 ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY ) COMPANY, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Plaintiff David H. Mangold (“Mangold”) brought the present action challenging his termination from defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk”). Specifically, he alleges that he was disciplined and terminated in retaliation for engaging in protected activity, in violation of the anti-retaliation provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API