Legal Opinion

Acme Refrigeration of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation & Heil-Quaker Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1986No. 85-4043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Whirlpool Corporation and Heil-Quaker Corporation appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff Acme Refrigeration of Baton Rouge, Incorporated (Acme). We reverse.

FACTS

This litigation focuses on the sale of “Whirlpool” brand heating and air conditioning equipment in a thirteen-parish area located in southwest Louisiana (the “trade area”). The equipment is manufactured by Heil-Quaker, a Delaware corporation, at its plants in Tennessee. At the time of trial, Heil-Quaker marketed its products by contracting with 54 distributors.

Whirlpool, another…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Hiram Walker, Incorporated, and South Florida Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. A & S Tropical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Philco CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
  4. Security Tire & Rubber Co. v. Gates Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Swann v. MagouirkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. BisnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Caribe Bmw, Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Bass v. CoupelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Precision Printing Co. v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API